<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark Matter: The Real Mysterious Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/dark-matter-the-real-mysterious-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/dark-matter-the-real-mysterious-universe/</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast specializing in offbeat news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:56:57 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jones Jeans</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/dark-matter-the-real-mysterious-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jones Jeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=585#comment-367</guid>
		<description>nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Rimoli</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/dark-matter-the-real-mysterious-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Rimoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=585#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Well, I agree with most of your explanation, but not all. I am sorry but you&#039;re are mixing Dark Matter and Dark Energy. You&#039;re right about the quantity of dark matter in our Universe, but it actually is known because of its gravitational effect - not the opposite. I am not sure about this &quot;repulsive gravitational effects&quot;. But dark matter shall not be the responsible, if it exists. In fact, it&#039;s the dark energy that does it, but as if the &quot;outside&quot; of the Universe was pulling matter in all directions, accelerating the expansion and eventually tearing everything into infinite pieces - even the atoms. This would be the most radical Big-Rip theory. Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I agree with most of your explanation, but not all. I am sorry but you&#39;re are mixing Dark Matter and Dark Energy. You&#39;re right about the quantity of dark matter in our Universe, but it actually is known because of its gravitational effect &#8211; not the opposite. I am not sure about this &#8220;repulsive gravitational effects&#8221;. But dark matter shall not be the responsible, if it exists. In fact, it&#39;s the dark energy that does it, but as if the &#8220;outside&#8221; of the Universe was pulling matter in all directions, accelerating the expansion and eventually tearing everything into infinite pieces &#8211; even the atoms. This would be the most radical Big-Rip theory. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dontbelieve</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/dark-matter-the-real-mysterious-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>dontbelieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=585#comment-295</guid>
		<description>My personal favorite astrophysics hypothesis is that of vacuum quantum fluctuations, which some physicists believe might actually be what we call dark energy (I might be confusing things, astrophysics is not my science). Anywhoo, this vacuum quantum fluctuations hypothesis describes the instantaneous appearance and disappearance of elemental particles (quarks) in empty space, which would be happening often enough that it&#039;s pushing the universe apart overcoming the force of gravity.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Entanglement is pretty cool too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, I have to make a pitch here for Astronomycast (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astronomycast.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.astronomycast.com/&lt;/a&gt;) an astronomy podcast that I follow where they talk about some really cool astrophysics. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, back to preparing a presentation I have to give tomorrow. Carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal favorite astrophysics hypothesis is that of vacuum quantum fluctuations, which some physicists believe might actually be what we call dark energy (I might be confusing things, astrophysics is not my science). Anywhoo, this vacuum quantum fluctuations hypothesis describes the instantaneous appearance and disappearance of elemental particles (quarks) in empty space, which would be happening often enough that it&#39;s pushing the universe apart overcoming the force of gravity.    </p>
<p>Entanglement is pretty cool too.</p>
<p>Now, I have to make a pitch here for Astronomycast (<a href="http://www.astronomycast.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronomycast.com/</a>) an astronomy podcast that I follow where they talk about some really cool astrophysics. </p>
<p>OK, back to preparing a presentation I have to give tomorrow. Carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.347 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-14 00:42:39 -->
