Mysterious Universe

The guy in Britain actually admitted to hacking into NASA files. These videos are available to anyone who has the (expensive) equipment to view them. This is why we should be grateful to Martin Stubbs for his work (which took 1000s of hours).

...wish objects weren't always 10+ miles away. Why can't they cruise past the portals for us?

I just want to know if this guy is " Hacking into NASA'S Feed " Wouldn't he be just as guilty as that guy from Britian who Hacked into our computer's & be subject to arrest? Just a thought.?!!!

Nothing conclusive here. Although it looks pretty neat!

If anyone has the DVD 'Earthlight' (DVD taken from space shuttle in orbit), and have time on their hands to examine the DVD footage closely, you will see a few 'UFOs' like these. I am not saying this disproves the UFO's in this story, but that it suggests that UFO's are so common in space that NASA didn't care about editing them out on a commercially available DVD. UFO's to many pilots and astronautics are commonplace. Buzz Aldrin frequently talks about the 'UFO' which the Apollo 11 crew saw following them on their way to the moon.

I didn't see anything solid, so to speak. With so much condensation it is easy to believe that is exactly what these "objects" are.

They aren't changing direction, accelerating or anything. A steady, constant motion like one would expect in space.

When we see one of those morphing UFO's up close or an object large enough to dock with the station...then we'll have a smoking gun.

I don't think people should "confused" and frustrated about these videos. And, then give up.

Of course, enthusiasts want to exaggerate the claims that these unknowns are UFOs and skeptics work hard attempting to debunk any speculation they're extraterrestrial or intelligently controlled or whatever (a lot of them, in fact, are paid to do just that). Most of the rest of us are trying to find a sort of middle ground.

But, it is difficult to find an explanation for an object traveling opposite of earth's gravitational pull as depicted by the small object in the second video. That is, if it wasn't controlled in some way by some entity or thing.

What looked like an object moving away from earth in said video, could have been a satellite in orbit that just looked like it was moving away due to the perspective of the camera. Of course one might wonder why watching a satellite fly by would be of such interest to those controlling the camera? But what do I know?, I don't work for NASA! Maybe it is important.

"claims that these unknowns are UFOs:

Ummm, a UFO is an unknown object. Any object your can't identify is a UFO. We cannot jump to conclusions that UFOs are space craft from other planets. I believe people DO see objects that are not made by humans, but we still don't know what they are, or where they come from. I have seen these myself. We also know nothing about the entities people report having contact with. The simplistic answer is they are "aliens" from another planet somewhere. The real answer is probably something much stranger than that. We have stories of humans interacting with non human entities for as long as we have been here. These used to be "little people" or "fairies" or "angles" or "demons" or whatever. They have abducted people way back in our history. It makes little sense for "aliens" to be doing this, so it's probably something else that we don't understand that makes itself look like aliens, or that's just the way we perceive them.

People see UFOs all the time. There are many good sightings my multiple people... look at the recent case in China during the eclipse. And we do have good photos and video. So why no photos of the grays? That will likely never happen. If they don't want to be photographed, they never will be. IF we can even photograph them in the first place. Much the same with ghosts.

Something is going on, that's for sure. We don't need a "smoking gun" because the evedance is overwhelming that people are seeing things in the skies. I mean if fifty people came to your home and told you there is an elephant on the front lawn, would you need them to show you a photo to believe them?

Problem is, we don't understand what is going on, and we have been looking at the wrong explanation of it. So we might not see UFOs in space around our planet because they don't need to do that. Observations show they can just appear and vanish. That said, they have been tracked coming in from space quite regularly.

Interesting footage, but it's amusing that anyone would call this the "smoking gun" of evidence. I have to agree with Ben, it just looks like space junk.

Why I think this is most likely space junk: http://bit.ly/OKLCk

Cant say its space junk but i also have to comment that in my opinion its probably not a ufo as well, if i had to make an intelligent guess i would go with.... most likely another neighboring satellite just making its daily orbit routine around the earth and reflecting the sun back.... but hey who really knows not I.

I wonder what would happen if NASA was confronted with this and had no where to run or weasel out? What would they do if back into a corner and had to say something? and I don't mean that "this is space junk" junk. Please just tell people the truth already, it's not like we don't know something is going on.

Dude, there is nothing to confront... the truth is that there are 3000 satellites orbiting around the earth, and thousands of pieces of debris, old satellites, etc. All I see in the video is something shiny, probably metallic, reflecting the sun's rays, or glowing because it's re-entering the earth's atmosphere.

If you go to his youtube channel, you can see the rest of his "UFO" videos. None of them prove anything, let alone the existence of intelligent extra-terrestrials visiting Earth, as this person claims. It does show, however, that he has a very overactive imagination.

Shiny objects in orbit =/= extra-terrestrial spaceships (or extra-temporal or extra-dimentional, like this guy claims at one point).

Can't say I saw anything in there that looked like it was "intelligently controlled". A few bright objects that could have been anything from a satellite to rock or even a tool box :P

As for the object that seems to be moving away from the earth's gravitational pull, keep in mind that you have no frame of reference to it's size or distance. It is probably small rock passing through the top of the atmosphere ( as in from "behind" the Earth ).

Nice footage though, gotta give the guy props for how he's getting the videos.

Well there isn't anything like causing more confusion! Reminds me of politics where muddy water is prevalent. Highly suspicious choice of design isn't it.

I have seen a UFO up close. I don't need a smoking gun. I can't say who or what was flying it though.

Joy Said:

"Once you can recreate a scene in a lab.. yeah, that's pretty much the end of it. "

No, all that shows is that you can make something that looks like something else.

A lot of debunkers try to show that something is something else by faking a photo or whatever. But all that ever really proves is that they can recreate something that looks like something else. It does not explain what the original video was.

Chances are the original video was space junk, but you can't prove that be making a new video, in a lab or otherwise.

That kind of debunking used to hold a lot of weight. There are reasons for that too. The reasons being that 30 years ago or so if someone saw an UFO and video taped it, one of their major claims was that "it must be an alien craft because nothing else can make this effect/occurance".

Now, anyone can get a very realistic looking UFO made in no time at all on 3D max or lightwave. It makes "debunking" things a lot less meaningful because almost anyone can make these effects!

I don't know... These space videos lost a lot of value for me once I saw the Discovery show that demonstrated the famous disk shaped ufo scenes were nothing more than particles that were too close to the camera's lens. Once you can recreate a scene in a lab.. yeah, that's pretty much the end of it.
I think the primary problem is the quality of the video and the fact that the sheer scale of whats being viewed (you know, that big chunk o' earth) creates weird depth perception illusions... Still interesting to see though!

No, the object in the first video isn't moving away from the earth's gravitational pull. The camera is zooming in and in so doing it gives the appearance that the object is moving. It might just be a satellite or junk.

But, the small dot of an object in the second video is traveling at an angle away from earth's gravitational pull. In fact, it continues to travel into deep space.

Martin Stubbs deserves a lot of credit. His dedication is awesome.

hmmm, I was waiting for the object's to change speed or direction.. Kind of strange but definitely not "the smoking gun" of UFO evidence. Good job to the guy though for tapping into NASA's downlink, thats awesome! lol

very interesting. the object in the first video seems to move away from the earth's gravitational pull; can not be just junk.

Every orbit is elliptical, so there are times when an object increases it's distance from earth before returning.

But this is beside the point which many have already stated, that a camera's perspective is grossly distorted when viewing things moving at these speeds at this distance in vacuous three dimensional space.