<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New NASA UFO Footage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-nasa-ufo-footage</link>
	<description>Blog and Podcast specializing in offbeat news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>The guy in Britain actually admitted to hacking into NASA files.  These videos are available to anyone who has the (expensive) equipment to view them.  This is why we should be grateful to Martin Stubbs for his work (which took 1000s of hours).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy in Britain actually admitted to hacking into NASA files.  These videos are available to anyone who has the (expensive) equipment to view them.  This is why we should be grateful to Martin Stubbs for his work (which took 1000s of hours).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onomaly Software</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Onomaly Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>...wish objects weren&#039;t always 10+ miles away.  Why can&#039;t they cruise past the portals for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;wish objects weren&#39;t always 10+ miles away.  Why can&#39;t they cruise past the portals for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonehead204</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>stonehead204</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>I just want to know if this guy is &quot; Hacking into NASA&#039;S Feed &quot; Wouldn&#039;t he be just as guilty as that guy from Britian who Hacked into our computer&#039;s &amp; be subject to arrest? Just a thought.?!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to know if this guy is &#8221; Hacking into NASA&#39;S Feed &#8221; Wouldn&#39;t he be just as guilty as that guy from Britian who Hacked into our computer&#39;s &#038; be subject to arrest? Just a thought.?!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skelliot</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Skelliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-573</guid>
		<description>That kind of debunking used to hold a lot of weight. There are reasons for that too. The reasons being that 30 years ago or so if someone saw an UFO and video taped it, one of their major claims was that &quot;it must be an alien craft because nothing else can make this effect/occurance&quot;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, anyone can get a very realistic looking UFO made in no time at all on 3D max or lightwave. It makes &quot;debunking&quot; things a lot less meaningful because almost anyone can make these effects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That kind of debunking used to hold a lot of weight. There are reasons for that too. The reasons being that 30 years ago or so if someone saw an UFO and video taped it, one of their major claims was that &#8220;it must be an alien craft because nothing else can make this effect/occurance&#8221;. </p>
<p>Now, anyone can get a very realistic looking UFO made in no time at all on 3D max or lightwave. It makes &#8220;debunking&#8221; things a lot less meaningful because almost anyone can make these effects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schliktdingdang</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>schliktdingdang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-469</guid>
		<description>I have seen a UFO up close.  I don&#039;t need a smoking gun.  I can&#039;t say who or what was flying it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen a UFO up close.  I don&#39;t need a smoking gun.  I can&#39;t say who or what was flying it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drago2005</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>drago2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Nothing conclusive here. Although it looks pretty neat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing conclusive here. Although it looks pretty neat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart James</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-374</guid>
		<description>What looked like an object moving away from earth in said video, could have been a satellite in orbit that just looked like it was moving away due to the perspective of the camera. Of course one might wonder why watching a satellite fly by would be of such interest to those controlling the camera? But what do I know?, I don&#039;t work for NASA! Maybe it is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What looked like an object moving away from earth in said video, could have been a satellite in orbit that just looked like it was moving away due to the perspective of the camera. Of course one might wonder why watching a satellite fly by would be of such interest to those controlling the camera? But what do I know?, I don&#39;t work for NASA! Maybe it is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-371</guid>
		<description>&quot;claims that these unknowns are UFOs:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ummm, a UFO is an unknown object.  Any object your can&#039;t identify is a UFO.  We cannot jump to conclusions that UFOs are space craft from other planets.  I believe people DO see objects that are not made by humans, but we still don&#039;t know what they are, or where they come from.  I have seen these myself.  We also know nothing about the entities people report having contact with.  The simplistic answer is they are &quot;aliens&quot; from another planet somewhere.  The real answer is probably something much stranger than that.  We have stories of humans interacting with non human entities for as long as we have been here. These used to be &quot;little people&quot; or &quot;fairies&quot; or &quot;angles&quot; or &quot;demons&quot; or whatever.  They have abducted people way back in our history. It makes little sense for &quot;aliens&quot; to be doing this, so it&#039;s probably something else that we don&#039;t understand that makes itself look like aliens, or that&#039;s just the way we perceive them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People see UFOs all the time.  There are many good sightings my multiple people... look at the recent case in China during the eclipse.  And we do have good photos and video.  So why no photos of the grays?  That will likely never happen.  If they don&#039;t want to be photographed, they never will be.  IF we can even photograph them in the first place.  Much the same with ghosts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Something is going on, that&#039;s for sure.  We don&#039;t need a &quot;smoking gun&quot; because the evedance is overwhelming that people are seeing things in the skies. I mean if fifty people came to your home and told you there is an elephant on the front lawn, would you need them to show you a photo to believe them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Problem is, we don&#039;t understand what is going on, and we have been looking at the wrong explanation of it.  So we might not see UFOs in space around our planet because they don&#039;t need to do that.  Observations show they can just appear and vanish.  That said, they have been tracked coming in from space quite regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;claims that these unknowns are UFOs:</p>
<p>Ummm, a UFO is an unknown object.  Any object your can&#39;t identify is a UFO.  We cannot jump to conclusions that UFOs are space craft from other planets.  I believe people DO see objects that are not made by humans, but we still don&#39;t know what they are, or where they come from.  I have seen these myself.  We also know nothing about the entities people report having contact with.  The simplistic answer is they are &#8220;aliens&#8221; from another planet somewhere.  The real answer is probably something much stranger than that.  We have stories of humans interacting with non human entities for as long as we have been here. These used to be &#8220;little people&#8221; or &#8220;fairies&#8221; or &#8220;angles&#8221; or &#8220;demons&#8221; or whatever.  They have abducted people way back in our history. It makes little sense for &#8220;aliens&#8221; to be doing this, so it&#39;s probably something else that we don&#39;t understand that makes itself look like aliens, or that&#39;s just the way we perceive them.</p>
<p>People see UFOs all the time.  There are many good sightings my multiple people&#8230; look at the recent case in China during the eclipse.  And we do have good photos and video.  So why no photos of the grays?  That will likely never happen.  If they don&#39;t want to be photographed, they never will be.  IF we can even photograph them in the first place.  Much the same with ghosts.</p>
<p>Something is going on, that&#39;s for sure.  We don&#39;t need a &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; because the evedance is overwhelming that people are seeing things in the skies. I mean if fifty people came to your home and told you there is an elephant on the front lawn, would you need them to show you a photo to believe them?</p>
<p>Problem is, we don&#39;t understand what is going on, and we have been looking at the wrong explanation of it.  So we might not see UFOs in space around our planet because they don&#39;t need to do that.  Observations show they can just appear and vanish.  That said, they have been tracked coming in from space quite regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamhenderson</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>williamhenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-364</guid>
		<description>If anyone has the DVD &#039;Earthlight&#039; (DVD taken from space shuttle in orbit), and have time on their hands to examine the DVD footage closely, you will see a few &#039;UFOs&#039; like these. I am not saying this disproves the UFO&#039;s in this story, but that it suggests that UFO&#039;s are so common in space that NASA didn&#039;t care about editing them out on a commercially available DVD. UFO&#039;s to many pilots and astronautics are commonplace. Buzz Aldrin frequently talks about the &#039;UFO&#039; which the Apollo 11 crew saw following them on their way to the moon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone has the DVD &#39;Earthlight&#39; (DVD taken from space shuttle in orbit), and have time on their hands to examine the DVD footage closely, you will see a few &#39;UFOs&#39; like these. I am not saying this disproves the UFO&#39;s in this story, but that it suggests that UFO&#39;s are so common in space that NASA didn&#39;t care about editing them out on a commercially available DVD. UFO&#39;s to many pilots and astronautics are commonplace. Buzz Aldrin frequently talks about the &#39;UFO&#39; which the Apollo 11 crew saw following them on their way to the moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerardo Jaime</title>
		<link>http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2009/09/new-nasa-ufo-footage/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerardo Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysteriousuniverse.org/?p=697#comment-362</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see anything solid, so to speak.  With so much condensation it is easy to believe that is exactly what these &quot;objects&quot; are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They aren&#039;t changing direction, accelerating or anything.  A steady, constant motion like one would expect in space.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When we see one of those morphing UFO&#039;s up close or an object large enough to dock with the station...then we&#039;ll have a smoking gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t see anything solid, so to speak.  With so much condensation it is easy to believe that is exactly what these &#8220;objects&#8221; are.</p>
<p>They aren&#39;t changing direction, accelerating or anything.  A steady, constant motion like one would expect in space.</p>
<p>When we see one of those morphing UFO&#39;s up close or an object large enough to dock with the station&#8230;then we&#39;ll have a smoking gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
