MUPLUS+   Join Plus+ and get exclusive shows and extensions! Subscribe Today! LEARN MORE  

 
Close

Advertise here now!

 
 

“Wild Men” May Be Lurking in North America’s Remote Woodlands

“I thought it was a feral human,” Mike Wooley recalls of the incident, arguably the strangest to occur during his time as an outdoorsmen. “I had heard about them, and done some reading about them.” Recalling the events of that December day in 1981, Wooley soberly tells of something frightening that occurred in the Louisiana backwoods that changed his life.

“It was a beautiful day, a perfect day for a hunt.” Wooley arrived at his deer stand, located down an old logging road in an area he had hunted frequently, and parking his vehicle halfway down the road, he walked to his tree stand, climbed into it, and silently enjoyed the cool air of the day while waiting for signs of game in the area.

After some time, the sound of an animal crashing through the brush caught his attention. Accompanying the sounds had been a small doe, which darted directly toward his stand and nestled beneath it, breathless. Wooley initially thought the tired deer had been chased by a larger potential mate, and waited eagerly for the buck to appear so it could be claimed.

What appeared instead defied every concept of what “should” exist here in Louisiana, or anywhere else.

A tremendous humanoid, covered in short hair, appeared instead, headed directly toward the deer, and Wooley’s tree stand, seemingly unaware of the hunter resting in it above. The figure approached to just a short distance of twenty yards before it stopped and, becoming alert to Wooley’s presence, peered up at him, its face wrenching angrily.

“As far as a Bigfoot, I thought that was something that (only) existed out in California. I thought that was something somebody made up to make money off of.” Contrary to his previous feelings, Wooley watched the thing for several frightened moments, eventually raising his hunting rifle and observing the thing’s face through the scope, though afraid to shoot anything that looked so human.

“The face was too human. The eyelashes, the teeth, the jaw structure, the forehead. The face was light brown, like it had a dark sun tan. But I couldn’t pull the trigger, because something told me this ain’t right. It’s not the right thing to do.”

The thing growled at Wooley in a way that reminded him of a lion’s roar, to which a loud whistle echoed from someplace up the ridge, as though in response. The “wild man” became alert to this, and appeared to respond with a similar whistle, then looked back at Wooley, who by now had chosen to take action. Leaping from the tree stand, he took off up the wagon road, attempting to close the short distance between his truck, and the location where this strange and feral intruder had now begun to pursue him.

woodman

Wooley made it to his truck, and turning to fire a warning shot, watched as the wood on a nearby tree splintered only feet away from the approaching man-beast. He then entered his truck and left, watching behind him as a second humanoid emerged from the brush, which joined his initial pursuer to watch him as he sped away from terrifying experience.

If anything, Wooley is lucky to have survived this alleged encounter with something that, if not human, had been remarkably close, but still different enough to arouse confusion about what he had seen, and whether killing it in self-defense would be ethical, or even lawful. Wooley hadn’t been quick to accept the idea of a Bigfoot standing before him, and despite thinking it could have been someone in a costume, had initially questioned whether some kind of “feral human” might have stood before him, upon observing the details of it’s face through the scope on his rifle.

While the idea of Bigfoot–a large, hairy manlike beast purported to exist in the North American wilds–is and has been a popular cultural phenom for the last half century or more, less often is the issue of actual feral humans discussed in relation to supposed Bigfoot encounters. Science does not accept the existence of such creatures as a reality (yet, at least). But on the subject of feral humans existing in remote areas, there may indeed be some compelling, if not frightening supporting data.

In what led to the authorship of the Missing 411 book seriesauthor and retired law enforcement officer David Paulides had begun researching strange disappearances in National Parks (which, it should be noted, he does not view in direct correlation with things like Bigfoot reports, instead taking a more objective, statistical approach to his investigations). However, one of the most compelling cases Paulides began to study early on had been the disappearance of a young boy, Dennis Martin, who vanished from within sight of his father in the summer of 1969 near Cades Cove in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

greatsmokey

One of the most striking details of the case (and one which National Park Service documents pertaining to Martin’s disappearance failed to note) had involved a strange observation made shortly after Dennis Martin went missing, a short distance away near the area of Rowans Creek. Mr. Harold Key and his family had been walking a trail in the area looking for wildlife–in particular, any sign of black bears nearby–when they heard “an enormous, sickening scream.” Within moments, Key’s son pointed out a bear nearby, located up the ridge from them. Mr. Key, upon observing the “bear” his son had spotted, determined this to be not a bear, but a “dark figured, rough-looking man” attempting to remain concealed behind a thicket.

The man, which Key didn’t manage to view in clear detail, had purportedly been carrying something over his shoulder; Harold Key, unaware of Dennis Martin’s disappearance earlier that afternoon, supposed that the figure might have been a moonshiner who had trying to hide from them. Upon learning days later of the search for Dennis Martin, Harold Key notified the FBI about what he and his family had seen the same afternoon Dennis went missing.

Dennis Martin was never found, although the footprint of a small boy’s Oxford-style shoe was located a few days after he vanished, and within 3.5 miles of Spence Field, where the Martin family had camped the night before. Several years afterward, an illegal ginseng hunter would come forward, claiming he had found the skull and other remains of a small boy in the same vicinity; however, a search of the area yielded no results so many years after the fact, as the man had feared that he might be arrested for his illegal activity in the area that led him to the discovery.

Still, along with the Oxford print by the nearby Pigeon River, the case of the “rough looking man” had been the other in a pair of leads later cited by retired National Park Ranger Dwight McCarter, which he had wished had been more carefully examined. During meeting between Paulides and McCarter in 2011, the retired Ranger had discussed “wild men” that were known to have lived in the area at the time of the Martin disappearance; however, these were not any sort of “wild creature” apart from mere humans which had made a conscious choice to live off the land. One of these individuals, according to McCarter, had even “worn a bear skin” around his person while trudging through the forest. Is there any connection that could be made between a wild or feral human in the Great Smoky Mountains National Forest, and the disappearance of Dennis Martin?

It should be noted, however, that the purported location of the child’s remains that were observed by the ginseng hunter had been three miles from Spence Field, and in the same direction of the shoe print searchers found by the Pigeon River; the location where Harold Key and his family heard the chilling scream just prior to observing a “rough looking man”, possibly carrying something on his shoulder, had been nine miles from the location. Unfortunately, due to the circumstances of the testimony provided by the ginseng poacher, no success came with subsequent searches for the mystery child’s remains, and thus no hard proof that a body was indeed found in that area can be offered.

The idea of “feral” wild men living off foraging and, at times, theft from hikers and campers in wilderness areas is more common than many would think. In 2013, Caity Weaver wrote an article on this with the rather sensational headline, “Feral, Thieving Mountain Men Keep Emerging from America’s Woods, Unwillingly.” In it, she discussed a pair of arrests of men who had been operating very similar to Dwight McCarter’s mention of “Wild Men” in the Smoky Mountains:

Early last week, authorities in Utah arrested Troy Knapp, the notorious “Mountain Man” outlaw, who had been robbing and defacing cabins in the southern portion of the state for nearly a decade. Two days later, officers from the Maine Warden Service arrested a legend known to locals as “the backpack burglar,” who had been living alone deep in the woods of Central Maine, burglarizing camps for 27 years.

The latter of these men had existed (unlawfully, mind you) for nearly three decades in Central Maine, an area which,in terms of climate, might present far greater perils than the locations of Wooley’s encounter with a beastly “feral human,” or even that of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park along the borders on North Carolina and Tennessee. Weaver went on to note of Christopher Knight, Maine’s mystery wild-man, that

Officers reported that Knight was clean-shaven, wearing a pair of clean jeans and a clean shirt. (His campsite included a makeshift shower protected by firs.) He told police he had spoken to only one other human since 1986: a hiker he encountered on a trail in the mid-1990s with whom he’d exchanged a brief hello… Knight, who offered no explanation as to why he decided to live alone in the woods for 27 years (“He said he frequently asks himself that same question,” said a Maine State Trooper), expressed “shame and remorse” over his burglaries and added that he was relieved to longer be living in solitude. He’s currently in jail on charges of burglary and theft.

Knight obviously didn’t fit the description many would stereotypically append to a purported “feral human” or “wild man,” unlike the mystery man clad in a bear’s skin that Dwight McCarter described to David Paulides. Still, it is interesting to consider the things that might drive a person to live in solitude like this for so long, and of course, the lengths to which they would go to survive. Obviously, theft is a common attribute… and depending on the individual, how much more would it take for the abduction of a small child to take place? Park Rangers had noted that food supplies for creatures like bears had been extremely low in the summer of 1969, with one unhealthy and emaciated bear reportedly released from capture near a feeding plot for deer. Arguably, anything living in the area would have faced the strains of this kind of food shortage; whether or not the culprit had been a bear or not is irrelevant.

To suppose instances of “wild” or feral humans living in remote areas is not intended to undermine the possibility that a creature like Bigfoot might exist. Nor is it offered here as an alternative explanation for things seen by the likes of Mike Wooley and other outdoorsmen who claim having encounters with man-like beasts.

But even for men who seek such monsters, it is hard to deny that in many cases, the most frightening beasts available to the mind are those which walk on two legs; no question over the existence of a Bigfoot is needed just to see the concern this statement entails, and the grim possibilities regarding strange disappearances of people from our National Parks it might suggest.

 TAGS: , ,

  • Well Done

    It seems unlikely that any men who decided to live in the wilderness would chase after a man carrying a hunting rifle. In fact, I question the whole story, for if he was safe in his deer stand, how close would Mr. rewilded get before taking a high-power round in the centre of mass? For that matter, no man would attempt to climb a tree and attack a person sporting a scoped rifle.

  • That might be true for a normal, rational person, but a normal, rational person doesn’t remove himself from society and go live in the forest like an animal. If is was indeed a feral man, then who knows the psychology of his behaviour?

  • Micah…the ‘feral’ man concept is not without merit. I still wonder what I witnessed during my encounter. I would describe it as more human than ape…even the facial features resembled early human. Interesting….

  • White Falcon

    “However, I do believe that men and women live in the wilderness.”

    Men and women sasquatch or men and women humans who have become wild or such like?

  • White Falcon

    Why doesnt a “normal, rational person” remove himself from society? Would it be crazy to live amongst nature so far away from Starbucks and Mcdonalds?

  • You offer that as a value judgement, but you’re not understanding that since the norm is living within society, choosing to live outside of it is not normal and is of questionable reason. I also didn’t ask the question of why, I stated what I just now restated.

  • Mia Person

    There are so many mysterious disappearances in the Missing 411 books that it really does “boggle the mind” as Mr Paulides likes to state…there is clearly something that is not understood by humans that is occurring world-wide.

  • ⚔Christophuh⚔

    you beat me to it.

  • White Falcon

    I think if I’m honest I was being a bit of a sarcastic, facetious little prick, so apologies. I guess I just have a romantic notion about people leaving the cities and going back to the forests. But I’m sure its illegal…

  • Cheeky Bum

    Be cautious where you squat to relieve your bowels while in the deep woods. You are at your most vulnerable. Fear not the feral man. Defend yourself with your vehicle’s bumper and yell defiantly “How do you like them apples ape man!”

  • Robert Kiehn

    Fascinating.

  • Jacob Marks

    Such “creatures” ?

  • JBat

    The possibilities of something out there are I’d say certainty not just possible, something is out there. It may just be humans, a human can go feral and will just like a hog if left alone in the wild for a time, well some but not all humans will. A hog left alone in the will resemble a true wild bore in less than a year, skin and hair thicken,tusk and teeth grow out, and the temperament gets bad. Humans as well exhibit these changes if completely gone feral. Hair on the skin thickens, nails thicken and become sharp, and the skin darkens. Males become loners all thoughts of modern life are gone, the human traits we know are gone just food and territory remain. Even speech is shelved and replaced by heightened senses, mating even forgotten unless they run onto a female and then no courting just a violent show of power to impress followed by chase and capture of the female. The male reacts like a wild animal whose territory is threatened when exposed to another male he probably don’t recognize as the same as him just a threat. Females on the other hand act very cautious and frightened when exposed to males tending toward trying to flee or stay hidden, only thinking of mating at certain times. She is very aggressive toward another female vicious even, but once mated is loyal and true to her mate and will fight to all to help him unless she has children then will return to them. There are documented cases of feral humans and it has taken years of therapy to restore human action and thought, with the subject not remembering anything of the incidents usually just moments of black, fear and anger. That is not to say this or most are feral humans, all options should be checked to rule anything out without 100% proof of another is arrogance at least bordering on childish. The possibilities are endless; Neanderthals have been found in America as far back as 50,000 years their tools and art proves at least our level of intelligence if not more, they had the first controlled chemical reaction to make glue from birch bark over 50,000 years ago and recurve bows we didn’t invent till the egyptians. Neanderthals could have not all been bred out as the new theory suggest, they showed a preference toward the hunter gatherer lifestyle. If they had our intelligence or more, were here, and wanted to stay hidden then why couldn’t they. Our intelligence, same or better senses, and a much better knowledge of an area where they hunt and its sounds so why do we consider it impossible? The giant cousin of neanderthal maybe not smarter but remains close to land bridge from asia suggest it probably made it here, and it’s actions/size fit sasquach legends well, especially attraction to human females, being cousins of neanderthals they should be close enough to breed or at least try. Again if on our level of intelligence then probable avoidance, hidden or buried feces, burial of dead, and strong hunting ability. Then there is the saquatch Gigantopithicus or decendant, missing link, or human adaptation from old days who knows. You can’t say any are wrong because all are theoretically possible so we need to approach all equally and prove one.

  • ELVISPUG

    It’s not crazy at all to have the desire to go and live a secluded life alone amongst nature. But if the person is delusional or not self aware and has strictly reverted to a wild state in his mind it is in that case not rational. In other words if I decide to live by myself in the woods and I am a rational person that is aware that I am not an animal I’m just a person who desires to live in this manner, and there are many people who do then it is not crazy at all versus a person who is not self aware n has reverted to his bassist animal instincts n thinks he is an animal due to whatever mental or environmental trauma issue he may have.

  • Adahy

    Hey you know a lot about the wild human state of mind and I finally found someone who knew there stuff . How did you learn the behaviors they express . I plan on becoming one of these humans to prove what it is to be human and if I don’t find a mate to go with me then I will just be a loner male living like a animal . Like you said and i so Bélive wher im going Ther is other wild human species like Sasquatch or something else. Will they be a threat or just a close niebor minding ther own business if I ever come across Sasquatch I will be more calm then most almost showing lack of interest and moving on with my learning . What do you think my future will be ?

  • Me24u

    I saw a huge dwarf once while hiking the mountains of Saskatchewan alone . I was so far away from civilization it shocked the beast. Whats odd was this thing spoke perfect English. We sat on this rock out cropping over looking this huge valley and spent the better part of the afternoon discussing of all things,the NFL . This guy was a huge fan and never missed a game. As the sun began to set we parted ways and I said good bye. I have never told anyone this because I thought people would think I was making it up.

  • JBat

    It depends on how well you adapt and how the weather holds in process. As far as meeting it depends on gender, population, and cycle. You won’t have a chance if you are unfortunate enough to run into a cast out male or a male with a cycling female. As far as how to change that part is natural we have the God given ability to Adapt just listen to your senses.