Feb 24, 2023 I Paul Seaburn

Sci-Fi Magazine Stops Accepting Writer Submissions After Receiving Too Much AI-Generated Material

If you are a fan of science fiction or fantasy fiction (or both), you have probably heard of Clarkesworld Magazine – an award-winning online fantasy and science fiction publication published monthly by founder and editor Neil Clarke. Artificial intelligence has long been a staple of science fiction – long before it became a reality. This week, real artificial intelligence collided with fictional artificial intelligence at Clarkesworld … and the result was not pretty. Neil Clarke announced that the publication is no longer accepting submissions – the lifeblood of magazines – because so many of them are blatantly written by tools that use GPT-3, the machine language software developed by OpenAI. And that is just the tip of the AI iceberg at Clarkesworld … and the sci-fi fiction world as well.

Can you tell who wrote what you are reading?

“Submissions are currently closed. It shouldn't be hard to guess why.“

In his tweet on February 20, Neil Clarke assumed that the sci-fi world would understand why he was no longer accepting story submissions at Clarkesworld. The responses made him realized he needed to provide context. In a tweet the next day, he explained in detail why.

  • 1. We aren't closing the magazine. Closing submissions means that we aren't considering stories from authors at this time. We will reopen, but have not set a date.
  • 2. We don't have a solution for the problem. We have some ideas for minimizing it, but the problem isn't going away. Detectors are unreliable. Pay-to-submit sacrifices too many legit authors. Print submissions are not viable for us.
  • 3. Various third-party tools for identity confirmation are more expensive than magazines can afford and tend to have regional holes. Adopting them would be the same as banning entire countries.
  • 4. We could easily implement a system that only allowed authors that had previously submitted work to us. That would effectively ban new authors, which is not acceptable. They are an essential part of this ecosystem and our future.
  • 5. The people causing the problem are from outside the SF/F community. Largely driven in by "side hustle" experts making claims of easy money with ChatGPT. They are driving this and deserve some of the disdain shown to the AI developers.

Welcome to the new world of science fiction writing. In a post on his personal website, Clarke explained that the pandemic brought an increase in submissions to Clarkesworld as people with ideas but no time to write suddenly had the time. Unfortunately, some also had time to plagiarize. As an experienced editor, he had a feel for the fakes and easily filtered them out. That changed in late 2022 when another spike in submissions brought Clarkesworld a new kind of article that Clarke says was becoming more difficult to spot – stories generated by ChatGPT tools or “AI” spam as he calls them.

“I’m not going to detail how I know these stories are “AI” spam or outline any of the data I have collected from these submissions. There are some very obvious patterns and I have no intention of helping those people become less likely to be caught. Furthermore, some of the patterns I’ve observed could be abused and paint legitimate authors with the same brush.”

How bad is the problem? Clarke reveals that 38% of the submissions to Clarkesworld in the current month were AI generated. If you support fighting technology with technology (a popular sci-fi plotline), Clarke says he’s tried the tools for detecting machine-written text (they are an expense many publishers cannot afford), but they are prone to false negatives and positives. Not only that, the same companies making these tools are also making tools for the AI spammers to avoid detection. Catch-22 for 21st century? In an interview with Quartz, Clarke admits some of the AI spam articles are easy to detect – for one thing, they always have perfect spelling! He also says that, like many other spams and scams, the bulk of them come from a few countries which he does not reveal – but he says he has legitimate writers in those countries as well, so he can’t just stop submissions from certain areas. He has other ideas, but admits that the battleground is changing so fast that any attempt is more like a game of “whack-a-mole.” At best, he’s hoping to evaluate submissions the old-fashioned way – with eyeballs and pencils - for a while technicians strengthen the submission software algorithms.

Going back to the idea that artificial intelligence, robotics and humanoid computers have been such a staple of science fiction, one might wonder if this problem has been addressed – and potentially solved – in some sci-fi novel or short story. If anyone should know, it’s Neil Clarke. Unfortunately …

“You know, I couldn’t really come up with any scenario where this lined up. I don’t think anyone anticipated using the robots to make art. This is one of those funny situations where everybody’s going, “Hey, should somebody have written about this?””

To some, this might seem like a harmless problem that may go away on its own as people get bored with ChatGPT and move on to the next bright shiny object. That may be, but in the meantime it is hurting Clarkeworld and all providers of writing financially as they are forced to spend more time weeding them out or competing with anonymous AI providers. Fans of Isaac Asimov and his three laws of robotics might point out that this is an instance, albeit small, of robots harming humanity – a clear violation that should result in the termination of chatGPT. Clarke agrees but doesn’t see this as the solution.

“They’re not trying to kill us. They’re just inadvertently burying us in all of their junk. I don’t think an AI is ever going to necessarily be any better than our best writer. The problem is not the quality. The problem is how quickly it can produce. It’s drowning out the other works, just by volume. That’s really what I see as the core issue we’re experiencing right now. It’s the quantity problem.”

Buried under our own junk. Will that be the epitaph on humanity’s tombstone? Reuters reports that Amazon’s e-book store includes at least 200 titles openly listing ChatGPT as an author or co-author - space-inspired poetry, children’s novels about penny-pinching forest animals, and how-to tutorials on using ChatGPT to supposedly improve one’s dating life. Should we just ban ChatGPT authors or anything written with the assistance of AI? Clarke points out that using cahtGPT to create a name for a character is similar to flipping through a phone book … and no one has ever credited a phone book as a co-author. In a sense, it’s a tool like a dictionary or a thesaurus or an idea-generator app. The writing of the story is still done by a human author. Amazon is hoping its writers adhere to its guidelines. It is obvious that this approach isn’t working.

"Who gets the credit?" is the wrong question to ask.

Fortunately, Neil Clarke is not shutting down Clarkeworld any time soon, but is using the publicity of the submission shutdown as an appeal to generate more needed subscriptions and donations. He says, and we agree, that short science fiction is where many writers cut their teeth, and losing it would have serious long-term effects on the genre. Let’s hope a solution is found before that happens.

FYI – this article was written by a human … you kan tell bye the speling!

Paul Seaburn

Paul Seaburn is the editor at Mysterious Universe and its most prolific writer. He’s written for TV shows such as "The Tonight Show", "Politically Incorrect" and an award-winning children’s program. He's been published in “The New York Times" and "Huffington Post” and has co-authored numerous collections of trivia, puzzles and humor. His “What in the World!” podcast is a fun look at the latest weird and paranormal news, strange sports stories and odd trivia. Paul likes to add a bit of humor to each MU post he crafts. After all, the mysterious doesn't always have to be serious.

Join MU Plus+ and get exclusive shows and extensions & much more! Subscribe Today!

Search: