MUPLUS+   Gain Access to Bonus Podcasts & Premium Content! Subscribe Today! LEARN MORE  

 
Close
 
 
Composition with Fourteen Cows and One Cow by Steven2358 via http://www.flickr.com/photos/steven2358/167103273/

Cattle Mutilations: Us or “Them”?

Within the annals of Forteana, there can be little doubt that one of the most mystifying of all puzzles is that relative to cattle-mutilations. As far as the UFO research arena is concerned, the one theory that, more than any other, provokes so much interest is the idea that the mutilations are the work of extraterrestrials engaged in nightmarish, genetic experimentation. But, perhaps, we should be looking down here, rather than to the stars, for the answers…

Following a series of mutilations between 1976 and 1978, Manuel S. Gomez, a rancher from Dulce, New Mexico, who had himself lost a number of cattle, approached the Senator for New Mexico (and former NASA astronaut), Harrison Schmitt, and requested that inquiries be made to determine if some form of investigation could be instigated to settle the problem.

Schmitt duly complied, and on July 10, 1978 wrote to Chief Martin E. Vigil, of the New Mexico State Police, and informed him of the concerns of Gomez, and other ranchers in the area, many of who were also losing livestock to the elusive mutilators.

Aware that Police Officer Gabe Valdez, of Espanola, had investigated a number of such cases, Vigil asked Captain P. Anaya, of the Espanola Police, to forward him copies of all relevant paperwork, which could be made available to the senator.

One report, filed by Valdez in June 1976, stands out as being of profound significance. At 8.00 p.m. on June 13, Valdez was contacted by Manuel Gomez and advised that he had found a three-year-old cow on his ranch that bore all the classic signs of mutilation. Gomez said the cow’s left-ear, tongue, udder and rectum had been removed with what appeared to be a sharp instrument. Yet there was absolutely no blood in the immediate vicinity of the cow, nor were there any footprints in evidence. There were, however, ground-markings that gave every impression some form of aerial object had landed and carried out a grisly attack on the unfortunate animal.

At 5.00 a.m. on the following day, Valdez set off for the Gomez ranch. On arriving, Valdez was confronted by a scene of carnage. The cow was just as Gomez had described: three years old, laying on its right-side, and with vital body-parts having been removed with the utmost precision. That was not all. There were also strange landing-marks. Valdez recorded the details in a two-page report:

“Investigations revealed that a suspected aircraft of some type had landed twice, leaving three pod marks positioned in a triangular shape. The diameter of each pod was 14 inches. Emanating from the two landings were smaller triangular shaped tripods 28 inches and 4 inches in diameter. Investigation at the scene showed that these small tripods had followed the cow for approximately 600 feet. Tracks of the cow showed where she had struggled and fallen. The small tripod tracks were all around the cow. Other evidence showed that grass around the tripods, as they followed the cow, had been scorched. Also a yellow oily substance was located in two places under the small tripods. This substance was submitted to the State Police Lab. The Lab was unable to detect the content of the substance.”

Three days later, Valdez contacted Dr. Howard Burgess, a retired scientist from Sandia Laboratories, and asked him to conduct a radiation-test at the scene. The results were astounding. All around the tripod-marks and in the immediate tracks, the radiation-count was twice that of normal. Valdez came up with an intriguing hypothesis for this: “It is the opinion of this writer that radiation findings are deliberately being left at the scene to confuse investigators.”

Valdez noted in his report that this incident was typical of those he had investigated over the course of a sixteen-month period. “They all carry the same pattern,” he asserted. Perhaps most pertinent, Valdez had been able to determine that, in a number of cases, the animals in question had high doses of atropine in their blood-systems.

“This substance is a tranquilizing drug,” reported Valdez.

What are the chances,  I wonder, of aliens from some far-away galaxy utilizing atropine to sedate cattle before systematically butchering them? Personally, I’d say the chances are practically zero.

In other words, while it is unlikely to satisfy those who so desperately wish to believe that the mutilations are the work of bug-eyed aliens from distant worlds, the presence of atropine in a significant number of the reports coming out of Dulce suggests we may be looking at a definitively home-grown operation – but one that utilizes the alien-motif as a convenient cover – focused on matters relative to biological-warfare and, perhaps, concerns about such worrying, and growing, issues as Creutzfeldt-Jacob-Disease, or Mad-Cow Disease, as it is more commonly known.

Someone, at an official level, it might well be argued, is deeply concerned about emerging viruses in the food-chain, and is secretly sampling cattle across the nation to determine the state of their health. Those engaged in such activities, however, are very happy to have you think the killings and mutilations are the work of aliens. Don’t fall for their ruse.

 TAGS:

  • Eckheart

    In veterinary medicine we use Atropine to increase the heartrate in emergencies and during anesthesia. It does not cause sedation.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve long since accepted the “anything is possible” argument; however, I’ve never gotten my head around the idea that cattle mutilations are a disinformation part of some government or shadow government project. It just seems like too much effort. Maintaining a herd of cattle by contracting a rancher or using one of the many (I assume) front ranches would no doubt be cheaper in the long run. As far as disease in the food chain, taking samples from abattoirs would yield far more information. If the cause of the mutilations is indeed terrestrial, the reasons have to be far more complex or sinister.

  • Uffdad

    Why go through all that trouble and risk when one could just go out and simply buy a cow to test? Is renting or buying a pasture and and introducing a cow or even a whole herd too difficult to accomplish? Why use millions of dollars of equipment and specially trained personel in the dark of night when samples can be easily obtained from any slaughterhouse?It doesn’t add up.

  • Anonymous

    could be after the atropine .

  • Guest999

    Black budgets can mask the application of funds from the GAO, Congress, Public Citizen, etc. but not large purchases being made of an open-market commodity, like cattle.

    Event that explanation seems exotic/unlikely but, in the grand scheme of things, is statistically it (a) more likely that an inefficient, nonsensical cloak & dagger operation is being run against cattle, or, (b) aliens have traveled light years to earth to conduct the same experiments? As unlikely as ‘a’ sounds it – statistically – is more likely than ‘b.’

  • will

    Just shoot on site.

  • Ufoxprt

    I investigated a cattle mutilation in Ohio. A farmer had been trying to cross breed a charlais and a buffalo to get a beefalo. The newborn was found dead early in the morning with no internal organs, no blood, and a 6 inch perfectly circular cut above the heart and a cut ear. There was a dark oil like residue on the top of the tall grass that made an arrow if seen from above. No blood or footprints found other than the farmers. The farmer took the animal, placed it on his truck and went to town sheriff demanding action against the perpetrators. He then took it to the vet who looked at it. His analysis showed laser cauterization at the circular cut. I have his autopsy report which was interesting but showed no traces of atropine or other drugs. He buried the carcass on his farm that day. We got word many days later and exhumed the carcass about a week later. Nothing was left but a few bones. The flesh had rapidly vanished and decomposed. After finding this as curious since this is by all means not common, we then sent soil samples to a local university lab with the hopes of finding an explanation for this rapid decay. Nothing was found. They suspected lime or carnivorous beetles but no indications of this and the case was deemed as unexplainable. One other note. A farmer on the next field over was combining his wheat with his grandson. They saw a disc shaped object move along a stream bed only a few feet above the ground towards the farm that had the beefalo. This was the day before incident. We contacted other UFO researchers and found strong similarities to other cases in other parts of the US. We also identified numerous cults in the areas and investigated these as possible responsible players but found no evidence that they may have played a part of this.

  • Anonymous

    The whole ‘Mutes’ scenario is hard to fathom. I know a lot of people feel some level of certainty in their own conclusions. From my own reading on and around the subject, I’m still undecided. As Nick suggests, a terrestrial agency (capital A) is the odds-on favourite for the explanation.

    At the same time, I can’t understand why an official or private organisation doesn’t take responsibility for the samples? Greenpeace and USDoA both use sampling methods for prions and radioactivity. In Greenpeace’s case, they test cattle across the world too.

    So what else could *someone else* really be looking for and *why* add the theatrical elements to the research? It’s all ‘cores n gore.’

    Each year in the US, there’s an on-going cattle rustling problem. It isn’t hard for livestock to disappear from the owner’s land. In this light, it isn’t uncommon for animals to be unaccounted for. So why would this *Agency* deliberately leave, in essence, red flags to show where they’ve been? Disposal would be a simpler process if we accept there’s an organisation behind the samplings; an organisation that’s mobile, fast and skilled to the point of remaining unseen for decades.

    Could the bodies be left behind as a statement or a deflection? I’m damned if I know! Whatever is going on doesn’t make much sense, to me, until more information becomes available.

    (Nice to see you posting on MU, Nick)

  • Anonymous

    jack ( jackIE ? ) the ripper had surgical skill . my mother always said that was one of VICTORIA ‘s kids .

  • Pingback: Cattle Mutilations Mystery Solved? - Paranormal Online | Paranormal Online

  • JiminyLicket

    I ask ye all this: Is it better to have mooed and be cattle mutilated, than to never have mooed at all?

  • http://www.cfzaustralia.com/ Rebecca

    To read a good treatment of this subject, read Colm Kelleher’s book http://tinyurl.com/4l3y3oc

  • Uffdad

    Sorry, I disagree. The cost of an average cow is about $800 and a calf being about 200 dollars. The cost of renting a pasture in the middle of nowhere is peanuts. The cost of a run of the mill army blackhawk helicopter is about 5.9 million dollars with the air force version being 10.1 million dollars. Of course, adding the expense of specialized equipment and personel, ground support, logistics, spare parts, etc greatly increases the overall cost. If you assume there is more than just a single helicopter involved then multiply it by the number of aircraft involved. Then compare that final cost with the cost of a cow. One can easily hide a black multimillion dollar operation but can’t hide the cost of a cow and a pasture? Sorry, the mystery continues.

  • Kirkunik1

    If our gov’t wanted cattle to experiment on…there would use their own raised cattle. It makes sense that they may be investigating cattle nationwide to see what is happening biologically. Could be either…to protect us from a germ…or to ingest us with a germ via food source. As our population swells and people are living longer….who is to know what plans these powerful people in control of just about every facet of our lives..may have for us.
    Something will have to be done. And history tells us….it’s either covertly done….or overtly..via Hitler, Stalin, etc. Our gov’t must do it covertly. Without our knowledge. If you want to reduce the population….do it biologically and stealthly. Check out the history of the CIA

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=664659068 Paul Finlay

    Us, absolutely no question of a doubt!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CUNN5J4RJ35LP6QAJLLRF2LMGA Jake59

    Wait a second:

    Doing a little research on atropine, one finds that atropine sulfate is: “For use as an antidote in the treatment of organophosphate insecticide poisoning of cattle, horses and sheep.”:http://www.allivet.com/Atropine-Sulfate-p/10114.htmIf atropine is routinely used in cattle then we cannot conclude that simply because high levels (what constitutes high levels?) of atropine were found in the “blood systems” a) must have been the cause of death, b) it must have come from some outside “source”. That atropine may have come from injections to treat insecticide poisoning. This still leaves the ET hypothesis in tact, it could have occurred that ET happen to abduct a cow with high levels of atropine in their system to begin with. Furthermore some ranchers, sheriffs, etc notice what appear to be intelligently controlled lights in the sky correlated with the discovery of mutilated cows:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPLxzrfXyugLook around 3:15Anyway this is a testable hypothesis, simply go out to Cow mutilation hot spots, equip every cow with a GPS tracker and wait.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CUNN5J4RJ35LP6QAJLLRF2LMGA Jake59

    Secret government agencies can easily buy cows, use some subcontractor to buy the cows for food and then direct them elsewhere and then perform whatever experiments they want. Why abduct cows? Makes NO sense.

  • http://www.squidoo.com/cattle-mutilation-modern-sacrifices-to-evil-gods Peter485672

    Whether they are using tranquilizers or not, at this point I would say anything is possible.

  • blue

    What if by these mutilations they do 2 things: 1. they experiment whatever is they want to and 2. they make you believe it is aliens who did it ?!… Remember that they have technology beyond what we can imagine and second, that they have a serious agenda about a false flag alien invasion…