Surrender to the Cloud: Transmigration of Information

Apr 29th in Featured & Science & Technology by

Imagine a world without the jump drives, desktop towers, and other information storage facilities of today. With the rate and speed at which technology is increasing exponentially in today’s world, what will the storage facilities of tomorrow look like? Will there be ways to tap into your most important–and personal–data without the need for the devices we normally use today?

This is a trend that seems to be occurring already. Writing for Wired Magazine this month, Steven Levy dished on his experience using the CR-48 for the last several months (and despite the name, this isn’t an inter-personal character-bot that follows you around taking notes… but expect to see one within the next five years). The CR-48 is actually a laptop computer designed around use of Google’s Chrome web browser, which Levy describes as having “minimal local storage, no discernible file system, no print drivers, and no client applications to install.” The idea here is simple: with the CR-48, we’re being taken in a direction where computers literally will become mere windows to the greater data cloud, rather than storage devices themselves. But is this truly the way of the future, or are we getting a bit ahead of ourselves with the direction our technology may be taking?

Any time I hear about these sorts of innovations and futuristic revisions of how we’ll work and interact a few years from now, I get a little disconcerted. Call me a worrier, but the truth is that if we migrate every bit of ourselves into an intangible data-cloud, we’re left with the constant threat of losing everything if (or maybe when) that cloud crashes or becomes inaccessible. If we read books like my pal William Forstchen’s One Second After, we’re treated to visions of a world sans-electricity, internet, and of course, the constant contact we’re afforded by sites like Facebook and Twitter. The idea Forstchen presents is pretty simple: an enemy nation of the U.S. decides to launch a nuclear warhead into the upper atmosphere above the country, creating a nuclear explosion in space, and thus producing a resulting electromagnetic shock-wave that decimates the electrical infrastructure countrywide. The reality of the EMP threat has been known to us for decades, and even a bit of my research into UFO sightings in areas of the south Pacific such as Johnston Island led me to nuclear tests like Starfish Prime, where the effects of an EMP blast of this sort became very apparent. Talking with Stanton Friedman about this a while back, he noted that such incidents may have even been “signals” to UFO occupants about the dangerous territory humankind had begun to enter throughout the Cold War years, thus concurring with Robert Hastings’ premise outlined in his book UFOs and Nukes.

But the threat here, aside from imagining how most would survive in a complacent world unaccustomed to life without the conveniences the electron can offer, is also a cultural one. If the greatest body of human knowledge migrates over to the web (or as I allude in the title, almost literally has an out-of-body transmigration from physical hardware over to the intangible data-cloud), what happens if we lose it? I personally love the smell of a new paperback book, and though I also advocate protecting our natural resources and recycling, the direction in which we’re heading seems to be unsteady at best.

So is it wise to begin manufacturing more and more hardware that incorporates less and less room or necessity for data storage? I wonder how long before the hardware itself will become obsolete; looking ahead, the direction we seem to be taking seems to allude less to migrating our information systems onto the web exclusively, but removing the middle-man that has become hardware altogether. In other words, maybe the future we’re actually heading toward is one where our bodies converge with the electronic ino-systems we’ve created. Ultimately, we will be the hardware, and the internet will form the basis of a forthcoming new collective electro-consciousness. If I’m right, and this truly is where we can expect to be a few decades down the road, again, we must ask what happens if we suffer some kind of catastrophic breakdown? In the absence of the web, do we lose some part of ourselves?

Maybe this is just crazy talk… or maybe I’m just fear mongering. Either way, my brain hurts, so turning things over to the collective, what are your thoughts on the matter? Is it wise to shuffle our information systems entirely over to the web, or is it even a realistic concept to assume that such a thing might ever happen?

Related Posts with Thumbnails
 
  • James Carlson

    Dear Sir or Ma’am,

    In reference to Robert Hastings, prominent in your article, he tends to say a lot of things, most of which can’t stand up to careful examination. Both Salas and Hastings are well-confirmed liars and frauds, pure and simple. If you do the research yourself instead of taking their word for what happened during an event they were not present to witness, I’m certain you’ll reach the same conclusion.

    For instance, Robert Hastings’ and Robert Salas’ claims for the past 15 years regarding a centerpiece of their “UFOs and Nukes” lectures is one of those cases. Hastings’ discussions of Robert Salas’ claims involving asserted experiences during the alleged UFO events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967 fail to take into account the widely known facts of Salas’ very poor credibility and his numerous, proven lies to the public regarding this matter. There were no UFOs involved at Echo Flight at all, and the incident at Oscar Flight never even happened. The men who have spread these lies, primarily Robert Salas and Robert Hastings, have done so for their own benefit, and they have proven to be both dishonest and wrong on numerous occasions in numerous ways. Both men are proven liars who didn’t merely get a few facts wrong; they invented them entirely, and they did so to take advantage other people’s desires to believe. This is how they earn their paychecks.

    The only thing people need to understand about sources of information like Robert Salas and Robert Hastings can be summed up pretty quickly: if you can’t trust them to tell the truth, why would you listen to anything that they have to say? They invesnt issues, write about them, and sell them to people; they charge outrageous fees for their lectures, and they sell videotapes and DVDs discussing their inventions as if they were factual. There is no basis in fact, however — the lies they’ve told are indisputable. And yet you are elevating them to a level of reasonable sources of validated information, and they are not.

    I would recommend that if you are truly interested in understanding something about Robert Salas’ or Robert Hastings’ credibility, you go to the following URLs, where you can download at no cost a book and supporting articles discussing in some detail exactly how far they can be trusted:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/26641522/Americans-Credulous-by-James-Carlson

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/42303580/Echo-Flights-of-Fantasy-Anatomy-of-a-UFO-Hoax-by-James-Carlson

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/49495918/The-Bunny-s-Retort-by-James-Carlson

    These are free to anybody, and you’ll never require an Amazon membership to learn a few of these facts. I would also recommend that you examine the numerous interviews and articles at the Reality Uncovered website: http://www.realityuncovered.net/ — seven of the top eleven articles all discuss the events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967, and include interviews with both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967 when the missiles were taken offline by an electronic noise pulse, an incident that was thoroughly investigated and very well documented. To this day, Robert Salas insists that both men confirm his claims of UFO interference, which both men deny strongly, while Robert Hastings refuses entirely to discuss the matter or answer any questions regarding the testimony of the only men who were present during the alleged UFO incident, preferring instead to attack the integrity and credibility of those raising such issues. Hastings has even gone so far as to invent entirely the titles and alleged contents of various non-existent books relating epilepsy to paranoia and mental illness in order to suggest that one of his many critics shouldn’t be trusted because of his epilepsy. Incredibly, he has also publically defamed the author of this missive by insisting that his own father “told him” about a nervous breakdown that has apparently been an ongoing crisis for over three years! Meanwhile, he refuses to answer necessary questions regarding his own numerous, proven lies, and has neglected as well to defend his own theories against numerous accusations of massive fraud and profiteering on a scale the UFO communities have only rarely been subjected to.

    A lot information regarding this incident can be found at the Reality Uncovered forum, in particular the Echo Flight Incident thread: http://www.realityuncovered.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1688&sid=fb3fd24f098c0f3bc35595ea1b41a146.

    Tim Hebert, an ex-USAF missileer himself, has also written some enlightening articles regarding the case on his blog at: http://timhebert.blogspot.com/

    Dr. David Clarke, for many years an accepted expert regarding the British military forces’ investigations of the UFO phenomenon for many years, has also discussed this case in the context of the “UFO and Nukes” connection asserted by author Robert Hastings. You can read his article on the subject at http://drdavidclarke.blogspot.com/2010/11/flat-earth-nukes.html.

    The lies currently being spread by Robert Hastings and Robert Salas have not merely been dismissed as one possible interpretation of their claims, they have been repeatedly proven as lies by witness testimony and documented evidence. There is no doubt whatsoever that they created this case for their own benefit. There were no UFOs involved — it is a lie, and nothing more. Witnesses that both men have presented to the public have actually come forward to dispute the claims these men have made. They insist that their statements were taken out of context and distorted purposely in order to suggest the presence of UFOs where no such presence could otherwise be established. Salas and Hastings have perpetrated a UFO hoax of the worst sort, and have attempted to destroy the reputations and career service of better men than themselves, all to sell their books and enable them to charge outrageous prices for their public speaking tours, lectures, and videos.

    The bottom line is simple: if they cannot be trusted to tell the truth, why would anybody believe anything at all that they have to say? Both men have proven themselves to be dishonest, so any information regarding this issue that they are being paid to discuss should not be trusted at all. These men have told numerous lies to support their assertions, and that should be taken into consideration whenever they present such doubtful claims as those they have repeatedly consigned to the public trough.

    Thank you,
    James Carlson
    jtcarl@yahoo.com
    Albuquerque, NM

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=5813622 Nick Tolman

    Your story about about the memory erasing made me think about alien abductions and an interesting bit of speculation occurred to me. Let’s assume that people are being abducted and that most hynotherapists who do memory recovery from abductions aren’t unintentionally creating false memories. Why are we assuming that the recovered memories are true? This species is allegedly smart enough to travel who knows how far, abduct people without overtly revealing themselves, and erase the memories of their victims. This shows they have a pretty good grasp of human biology and psychology. Not to mention how technologically advanced they are. So why are they allowing the repressed memories to be recovered in the most low tech way possible. It’s like they want these memories to be found because they aren’t the real memories. They implant people with fake memories of their experiences and in some cases tell the people New Agey bullshit in and effort to discredit the people who come forward.

  • Red Pill Junkie

    The problem is not having an infocloud where anyone could tap into to access data at will. The main problem would be IMO if we only fill that cloud with senseless crap —imagine that in 2025 the only way to shut off all the ‘breaking news’ about William’s coronation would be having a lobotomy! :P

    Maybe the answer to your fears would be to devise some sort of ‘holo-cloud’ where a small part of it has enough information to re-create the whole —the same way holograms function.

    In any case, I get the feeling that people will still care enough about special mementos and things about their personal lives as to want them preserved in some sort of tangible format —right now teenagers are the ones more immersed in the nascent info-cloud, and has anyone noticed their bedrooms becoming *less* cluttered? ;)