MUPLUS+   Join Plus+ and get exclusive shows and extensions! Subscribe Today! LEARN MORE  


Advertise here now!


Gunung Padang and The Lost City of Atlantis

There are megalithic sites and then there are megalithic sites.  Our ancestors, it seems, were particularly fond of building things.  Look at the skyline of any major city and you can see we haven’t strayed too far from that ideal ourselves.  From stone circles to pyramids, the builders of the ancient world knew well how to create a structure that will last through the ages, and our landscapes the world over show many examples of their expertise.

We know quite a bit about these ancient structures too.  We know how the pyramids were built, we know who build the ruins in Greece and why, we know (or we think we know) how the massive walls and terraces were built in Mesoamerica, and for the most part, we know when all these structures were built.  For a long time, it was thought that the oldest structures built in the ancient world were somewhere around 9000 years old.

That all changed with the discovery of a temple structure in modern day Turkey called Göbekli Tepe.  This discovery flipped the conventional wisdom of archaeology upside down, because following careful excavation and analysis, the site was dated at 10,000 BCE.  That’s at least 4000 years earlier than any other known structure.  Considering its age, Göbekli Tepe is fairly sophisticated in terms of its construction and the artwork that’s associated with it.  The site now carries the title of Oldest Known Megalithic Site, or at least it did.

There’s a new kid on the block though, or an old kid, or…whatever. Gunung Padang is that kid, so to speak.


First described in the Dutch naturalist manual Rapporten van de Oudheidkundige Dienst in 1914, Gunung Padang had been known to locals for millennia.  It sits on a hill in the Indonesian village of Karyamukti, which is in the Cianjur regency, in West Java province.  It is described as the largest megalithic site in south-east Asia, and at first glance appears to be a series of terraces with bordering walls and successive steps between each.  The terraces are covered in large volcanic rocks organised into lines and shapes, and the local Sundanese people declare the site to be sacred.

Early attempts to analyse the site resulted in dating of around 5000 BCE, which would put it in line with other sites in Asia and Europe.  Radiometric dating and geoelectric testing done in 2012 seemed to confirm that date, though they found, quite surprisingly, that the site doesn’t actually sit on a hill.  It is the hill.

Gunung Padang is a pyramid; one of the few pyramids found in south-east Asia.  The site was found to have chambers and shafts hidden under the overgrown terraces with walled areas and other structures buried under centuries of natural reclamation.  The next step in the excavation was to drill core samples in various locations to try to nail down a more accurate age for the site.  This proved to be a dangerous endeavour for three tomography researchers who were beaten and kicked by locals who objected to the work, citing the sacred nature of the site.[1]

Nonetheless, the work continued and the results were astounding.

Analysis of core samples of the hill and structure began to reveal greater and greater age the deeper they looked.  From 5000 years, to 8000 years, to 10,000 years and all the way up to a reported 23,000 years old.  These numbers are incredible!  The implication is that this site is the oldest known structure of any kind on Earth.

“The results of radiometric analysis of the content of the carbon element in some samples of cement in drill core from the depth of 5-15 meters which was conducted in 2012 at the prestigious Laboratory, BETALAB, Miami, USA in the mid-2012 shows its age with a range between 13,000 and 23,000 years ago.”[2]

Those results are contested, of course.  Whenever data takes a drastic detour, one not expected by experimental guidelines, the first conclusion has to be that some mistake has been made.  Experts on either side of the debate, however, are thus far unable to identify any problems in the coring procedures or in the radiometric dating that could account for such a drastic deviation from expected results.  Currently the official age of the site is listed as “older than 5000 years”, which is maddeningly unhelpful, but research is continuing.

One of the most interesting things about Gunung Padang, aside from its age, is that during coring it was found that much of the buried structure was reinforced with a type of cement.  This bonding agent, which has been used as a mortar and sort of glue in certain parts of the site, consists of 45% iron ore, 41% silica and 14% clay.  It’s said that this mixture provides for a very strong and durable mortar base, and is surprising evidence of the level of sophistication of the building technique.

It should come as no surprise that some have claimed this discovery in the name of ancient aliens, but the more interesting claim in that regard is in support of the One World Origin Theory.

Artist's impression of Gunung Padang as it would have looked in antiquity (© Pon S Purajatnika)

Artist’s impression of Gunung Padang as it would have looked in antiquity (© Pon S Purajatnika)

Famed Fortean author Graham Hancock has proffered a hypothesis featuring Gunung Padang, wherein he suggests that this site may hold evidence of the lost city of Atlantis.

In a piece on Signs of the Times, Hancock tells of experiences he had with Danny Natawidjaja PhD., senior geologist of the Research Center for Geotechnology at the Indonesian Institute of Sciences.  The two visited Gunung Padang and discussed the implications of these discoveries.

According to Natawidjaja, the site is indeed more than 22,000 years old.

“The geophysical evidence is unambiguous,” Natawidjaja says. “Gunung Padang is not a natural hill but a man-made pyramid and the origins of construction here go back long before the end of the last Ice Age. Since the work is massive even at the deepest levels, and bears witness to the kinds of sophisticated construction skills that were deployed to build the pyramids of Egypt or the largest megalithic sites of Europe, I can only conclude that we’re looking at the work of a lost civilization and a fairly advanced one.”[3]

It’s difficult to argue with him, and his research had led him to believe that the lost civilization in question is indeed Plato’s high civilization at the height of the last ice age, as documented in the Greek philosopher’s dialogues Timias and Critias (these dialogues are the only source of information on Atlantis, and all speculation is based on Plato’s description).

There are obvious parallels, not the least of which is the coincidental time frame.  If the dating is correct, then much of the Gunung Padang site was constructed and in use during the peak of the last ice age.  This is a time when the area of Indonesia and south-east Asia was very different.  Ocean water levels were drastically lower, by as much as 400 feet, making what are now islands part of the mainland and drying up rivers.  Natawidjaja believes that this made possible the advancement of a sophisticated culture which flourished in the region, and Hancock believes these unconfirmed facts are evidence that modern archaeology, as an entity, is covering up the existence of a previously unknown advanced civilization.

Critics, of course, point to the uncertainty in the dating results and cry foul over their use as evidence that the site originates from the 22nd millennium BCE or earlier, and claim that there is no cause to connect the site or the region with the lost city of Atlantis.

There is much still to learn about Gunung Padang, and of Göbekli Tepe and many more ancient megalithic sites, but the answers seem tantalizingly close.

[1] Yayan Sopyani Al Hadi. Situs Gunung Padang Berdampak pada Kebangkitan Kebudayaan (Site of Mount Padang Impact on Culture Awakening).

[2] The Site of Mount Padang is the Evidence of Architectural Masterpieces of the Ancient. Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia

[3] Graham Hancock. Gunung Padang: The Lost Record of Atlantis. Signs of the Times

 TAGS: , , , ,

  • ivr

    Although I would put a question mark next to paragraph two and question referring to Graham Hancock as a Fortean author, I believe this topic is an important area to keep under the microscope, so to speak. Two other articles I came across to day give this story some legs. One is about 300,000 year old hearth discovered in Israel and the other is about a 700,000 year old hominid skull found in Greece. Both articles suggest that a migration of intelligent beings and technological development happened in a way and at a pace that has yet to be understood. However, unless it is for marketing purposes I would keep the Atlantis concept under wraps. One would have to draw a long bow to conect Plato with Indonesia.

  • Michael Sandera

    Are these the edifices build by the men of renown before the great flood mentioned in geninis

  • Swilson

    This is the first I have heard of this site. Unfortunately I immediately discredit anything Graham Hancock has to say about anything. I don’t even think i would believe him if he were giving me directions in his home town. That being said I find this site very interesting and am going to research what other information is available from real scientists about it and I am looking forward to future studies.

  • meatwad_SSuppet

    It can’t be that, because genesis is a fraud made up by long dead hebrews.

  • This idea of (very) ancient use of cement in order to build pyramid-like constructions immediately reminded me of 2 things: how the late Philip Coppens supported the idea that the Great Pyramid’s greater ‘stone’ blocks were actually cast out of a type of limestone cement, based on the research & achievement of Joseph Davidovich, the father of Geo-polymers.

    The other thing I remembered is the Bosnian pyramids, because a similar material has been also been found. But, it has to be said, geologist Robert Schoch has always thought of Osmanagic’s find as natural formations instead of artificial constructs, and the ‘cement’ as a type of natural material, so I would be very interested to know what Robert thinks of these new findings at Gunung Padang.

  • bazo

    You’re an elitist. Science is for the bold. Hancock is a profound scientist. You, however, are an obscure techician.

  • Doubletake

    I’m familiar with Hancocks work. Can you give us a few examples of why you discredit him altogether?

  • Doubletake

    I have a problem with the second paragraph second sentence. When did we figure out how they built the pyramids?

  • David F Lanphere

    How about just acknowledging that the site exists, the locals didn’t build it, and they consider it “sacred”. How old it is will always be debatable, and people will continue to fight over what is “correct”. If it is possible to continue to study the site with the cooperation of the locals, so that the scientists don’t risk their lives for just being there. We have enough problems with “establishment archaeologists” hiding artefacts just because they don’t fit into an established dialogue. Do the best we can, and always tell the whole truth!

  • William John Meegan

    I would think that if this site: Gunung Padang is indeed about 22 to 23 thousand year old there should be a great deal of meteorite dust from the Galactic Core Explosion, which Dr. Paul VaLette (EARTH UNDER FIRE) found in the ice core samples of that era, mixed into the mortar used as cement in the building of this pyramid..

  • Jurriaan

    I’ve been there, it’s really unbelievable what has been put down there. When you go there and sit on your haunches you can feel the serenity. This place is, in my experience, used to pray a lot. I would recommend anyone to go there. It is really worth it.

  • Is Haryuni

    the fact is the location is not so far from my residence.. but i just take it as a mountain

  • Sunderling

    My husband read Fingerprints of the Gods, and went through the cited sources, buying many of the books referenced and reading them complete. He found that Hancock had changed many of the things he quoted, from changing measurements of pyramids to make ratios of sides the same in different civilizations, to adding words into quotations to support his theories, to citing books that quoted primary sources instead of going to the primary source itself. He is about as intellectually dishonest as they come.

  • ts

    don’t forget that one of of the first known human ancestors the homo erectus or “Java Man” was also discovered on this mystical island…

  • Ron Roffel

    With the remains of Homo Sapiens starting at over 1,000,000 years ago, it would not surprise me in the least that this site dates back over 20,000 years. That gap of over 900,000 years of human history could hold a lot of evidence for advanced civilizations that predate the Groove Ware people, Sumer and Old Europe.

    But Atlantis? That old saw was buried long ago with the book The Sunken Kingdom, a little known analysis of Plato’s work and his sources.